Author: Vincent Mousseau

  • Joy, Survival, and the Refusal to Be Broken

    Joy, Survival, and the Refusal to Be Broken

    Notes from a Night of Performance and Resistance

    As Saidiya Hartman reminds us, Black life moves through the tension of mourning and survival, a condition intensified for Black queer and trans people whose very existence challenges the terms of the social order. In a world structured by anti-Blackness, where exhaustion is manufactured and joy is framed as indulgence, Black pleasure is a radical act of refusal. It is a practice of world-building amid dispossession.

    This refusal, this reclamation, is what I found myself reflecting on last night at the Wiggle Room in Tiohtià:ke, where I attended a burlesque show wrapped in the language of tarot and transformation. The performances that unfolded were not simply acts of entertainment, but rituals—embodied acts of storytelling that spoke to the precarity and possibility of life under structures that seek to contain us.

    Each performance was shaped by the energy of a different tarot card, an invocation of mysticism woven into movement and presence. The night had been playful, filled with laughter and cheers, until Phoenix Inana took the stage. Unlike the other performances, theirs was not burlesque—it was performance art, and it demanded silence. A rupture in the rhythm of the night.

    Phoenix embodied The Devil, but through deliberate intervention, they transfigured the archetype—not as a warning of corruption, but as an opening toward self-possessed liberation. They wove The Devil into the figure of Lilith—a symbol of defiance, a body ungoverned, a refusal to be subdued. In dominant narratives, The Devil is a sign of excess, indulgence, a descent into desire. But in Phoenix’s hands, The Devil became something else entirely: an opening, a confrontation with the self, a refusal to abide by the moral logics that have long been used to discipline those cast as deviant. Their movement, measured and defiant, enacted what Mackey calls affective choreography—a performance that is not for spectacle but for insurgency, refusing the logics of discipline.

    As Hortense Spillers reminds us, the body under colonial and patriarchal orders is always already marked for discipline. To reclaim the figure of The Devil—through Lilith, through the rejected feminine—is to refuse the very foundations of that discipline. The room held its breath as Phoenix moved—deliberate, magnetic, speaking in a language beyond words. They did not perform for an audience; they conjured something larger, something uncontainable. A reckoning with desire, with shame, with the ways we have been taught to fear our own hunger for pleasure, for freedom, for more. In that moment, The Devil was not a force of corruption but of possibility—the permission to exist outside of the constraints imposed upon us.

    Before the performance began, I noticed a tarot card had been left on my seat—the Eight of Cups. I didn’t think much of it at first, but later that night, after stepping into the cool air outside the venue, I pulled out my phone and looked up its meaning. Departure. Choosing oneself. The aching, necessary act of walking away. The card’s imagery—cups abandoned, a figure moving forward—settled into my chest.

    It was a lesson I have met before. One that keeps finding me. To leave is not to retreat but to carve out the possibility of elsewhere—to refuse the exhaustion of extractive institutions and instead move toward Black queer possibility. In the afterlife of slavery, where Black life is both hyper-visible and disposable, departure is not just a metaphor—it is a method of survival. We leave institutions, relationships, even versions of ourselves, because survival demands movement.

    I carried that message with me as I lingered after the show, laughing, exhaling, held in the kind of embrace that only chosen family provides. The space between us—our breath, our joy, our indulgence in the moment—was a refusal. Not an escape, not a reprieve, but an insurgency. These nights are not outside of struggle; they exist in direct opposition to the anti-Black, capitalist systems that demand our exhaustion, our suffering, our depletion.

    These spaces of performance, of radical belonging, exist within a lineage of Black queer world-making. One of the most enduring examples of this is ballroom—a subcultural movement rooted in the survival of Black and Latinx queer and trans communities. Ballroom was born out of necessity, a direct response to anti-Black and anti-queer exclusion from white-dominated LGBTQ+ spaces in the mid-20th century. It became not just a venue for performance but a site of kinship, a world where categories of gender, beauty, and realness were reimagined on Black and brown terms.

    Ballroom operates as a Black queer counterpublic—an insurgent archive of survival, where kinship is built outside the logics of capitalist extraction, and where the aesthetics of gender, performance, and belonging are constantly being rewritten in real-time. While ballroom remains deeply rooted in Black and Latinx history, it has also grown into a space where others who have known displacement, resistance, and the urgency of chosen family can find belonging. As Godmother Phoenix Inana Sankofa LaBeija, she has taken up the role of mentor and guide, carrying forward the commitment to craft, care, and those who come after. Her position within ballroom is not just a title; it is an obligation—to those who seek space in a world that denies them room to breathe.

    The world grinds us down. It tells us that we must earn rest. It frames joy as frivolous. And yet, we choose otherwise. We gather. We celebrate. We insist upon ourselves.

    To persist is to resist, but to insist on joy is to demand livability—not as a concession, but as an act of abolitionist defiance, a refusal to let extraction be our only inheritance.

    The Eight of Cups is a departure, yes, but it is also a return—to self, to possibility, to the world we are making together. As I walked out of the Wiggle Room, my fingers still tracing the Eight of Cups in my pocket, I felt something shift within me. Sometimes, the universe delivers its messages in grand gestures. And sometimes, they arrive in a performance piece that demands silence. A tarot card left on a seat. A night spent in the presence of those who see you fully.

    And sometimes, those messages are simple but profound:

    Keep going.
    Keep choosing yourself.
    Keep finding joy.

    Because that, too, is resistance. That, too, is survival. And even when the world gives us nothing, we will make ourselves—together.

  • A Gesture of Hate

    A Gesture of Hate

    In the aftermath of Elon Musk’s unmistakable Nazi salutes at Donald Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025, much of the media coverage has predictably veered toward obfuscation, excuse-making, and, most disturbingly, a kind of ableist scapegoating. Instead of calling out the gesture for what it is—an unambiguous alignment with fascist symbolism—mainstream narratives have gone to great lengths to soften its implications. Some have even resorted to blaming Musk’s autism or Asperger’s diagnosis, a form of saneism that shifts focus from fascism to neurodivergence. This is a dangerous, disingenuous, and ableist deflection, and as a mental health professional, I’m here to say: stop blaming autism for white supremacy. 

    Saneism in the Defense of Fascism

    Saneism—the systemic discrimination against people deemed “mentally unfit”—has long been a tool of oppression, wielded to delegitimize, discredit, and silence. In this case, it’s being weaponized to absolve Musk of accountability. Media outlets and commentators alike have leaned into the narrative that Musk’s alleged neurodivergence might explain his behavior, as though autism or Asperger’s somehow predisposes someone to fascist gestures. 

    This is not only an absurd and unscientific claim but a profoundly harmful one. It reinforces the stigma that neurodivergent people are socially inept, dangerous, or incapable of understanding the implications of their actions. It erases the agency of neurodivergent people while simultaneously absolving powerful individuals of their complicity in oppressive systems. 

    Let’s be clear: Autism is not a precursor to fascism. Fascism is learned. It is deliberate. It is a choice made by people in positions of power who understand exactly what they are doing. To conflate neurodivergence with hate is to perpetuate ableism on a massive scale, distracting from the real issue: the normalization of fascist ideology in our society. 

    The Media’s Role in Normalizing Hate

    The media’s handling of Musk’s gesture reflects a broader pattern of reluctance to call out fascism for what it is, especially when it comes dressed in wealth, influence, and tech-world allure. Instead of interrogating the deeper implications of Musk’s actions, outlets have chosen to debate his intentions, contextualize the moment as a misunderstanding, or—most egregiously—blame his neurodivergence. 

    This avoidance is more than cowardice; it’s complicity. By deflecting attention from the explicitly fascist nature of the gesture, the media allows it to be rebranded as harmless, ironic, or accidental. This creates fertile ground for fascism to grow, unchecked and unchallenged, under the guise of plausibly deniable “jokes” or misunderstandings. And by dragging autism into the narrative, it compounds the harm, further marginalizing neurodivergent communities in the process. 

    Why This Matters: The Path from Symbols to Systems

    As a mental health professional, I work with clients who are intimately familiar with the toll of ableism, racism, and systemic oppression. Many of them are neurodivergent, many of them are Black, and all of them live under the weight of a society that demands they justify their existence while figures like Musk are given free passes to perpetuate harm. This moment is a microcosm of how hate operates—not in overt, glaring announcements, but in subtle, insidious gestures that the powerful dismiss while marginalized communities suffer the consequences.  

    Symbols matter. They carry weight. When someone as visible as Musk performs a Nazi salute, whether ironically or not, it signals alignment with systems of white supremacy. The fact that this act is being minimized or dismissed outright is not an accident; it is part of the slow normalization of fascism in mainstream culture. And by blaming autism, the media doubles down on the harm, turning attention away from systemic hate and toward an already marginalized group. 

    A Call to Action

    We cannot let this slide. We cannot let Musk or his defenders hide behind ambiguity, ableism, or irony. We must call this out for what it is: a deliberate act of fascist signaling, made more dangerous by the media’s refusal to engage with its implications. 

    If we allow saneism and ableism to dictate this narrative, we betray not only neurodivergent communities but all those targeted by the systems of hate Musk’s gesture reinforces. As someone who works every day to support mental health and challenge oppression, I know how deeply these narratives harm. And I refuse to let them go unchallenged. 

    To the media: Stop blaming autism for fascism. To the public: Hold Musk accountable. To all of us: Resist the normalization of hate, in every form it takes. This is not a misunderstanding. It is a wake-up call. And we cannot afford to hit snooze. 

  • Urgent Call for Dalhousie to Divest from Companies Complicit in Israeli Occupation

    Urgent Call for Dalhousie to Divest from Companies Complicit in Israeli Occupation

    Dear Members of the Dalhousie University Board of Governors,

    As a current doctoral student at Dalhousie University, I feel compelled to speak out on an issue that goes to the very heart of our shared values as an academic institution. The university’s investments in companies complicit in the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestine contradict its commitments to equity, justice, and human dignity. This is not just a financial matter—it is a moral crisis. Dalhousie’s continued financial ties to these companies make it complicit in ongoing violence that the United Nations has clearly identified as having genocidal intent.

    The recent report  by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese provides chilling details about the systematic destruction of Palestinian life in Gaza. The report describes the forced displacement, mass killings, and deliberate targeting of civilians as actions that amount to genocide. This is not a distant issue; it is one that our university directly engages with through its investments in companies that profit from illegal settlements, home demolitions, and militarized violence. These financial choices have real, devastating consequences for millions of Palestinians.

    Dalhousie’s history shows us what happens when institutions prioritize profit over people. The Lord Dalhousie Panel Report laid bare the university’s deep entanglements with anti-Black racism, slavery, and colonial exploitation. While efforts have been made to address that legacy, the university’s investments in companies enabling the destruction of Palestine perpetuate the same systems of violence. These decisions undermine everything Dalhousie claims to stand for.

    As a student at this university, I had felt proud to be part of a community that values equity and reconciliation. But those values must be reflected in our actions, and over the three years I have spent at Dal to date, what I have seen is a lot of lip service to equity and social justice without doing the very difficult work needed to actively undermine the legitimacy of the systems that reinforce oppression. Let me be clear: investing in companies complicit in genocide is antithetical to everything our community profess to believe. We cannot look away while lives are being destroyed, communities erased, and an entire people subjected to state-organized oppression. Neutrality in the face of such violence is complicity.

    My work as a scholar focuses on how systemic violence fractures communities, identities, and lives. I know deeply how interconnected these struggles are. The settler-colonial violence Palestinians and Lebanese populations face today is not unlike the legacies of anti-Blackness and Indigenous dispossession that continue to shape Canada and Nova Scotia. These systems of oppression are linked, and our response to one reflects our commitments to all.

    Dalhousie has an opportunity to lead—not with words, but with action. Divestment is not a radical demand; it is a necessary step toward aligning the university’s financial practices with its values. By divesting, Dalhousie can affirm its commitment to justice and human dignity, standing in solidarity with those resisting systemic violence. This is not just about Palestine—it is about Dalhousie’s role in shaping a more just world.

    I urge you to act now. Divest from all companies complicit in the illegal Israeli occupation. To delay is to allow our resources to continue funding violence and destruction. The choice before you is clear: to perpetuate harm or to stand on the side of justice.

    This is a defining moment for our university. Let Dalhousie be remembered as an institution that chose accountability and courage in the face of genocide. Let it be a leader in the fight for equity, dignity, and human rights.

    In solidarity,

    Vincent Mousseau, MSc RSW
    PhD Student
    Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University